Sudhir S/O Pralhad Dhavale v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bare adjournment order of the Bombay High Court (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) in CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 967 OF 2024, Sudhir s/o. Pralhad Dhavale (appellant; counsel Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate, with Devyani Kulkarni) versus The State of Maharashtra (Respondent No.1-State; A.P.P. Anand Subhash Shalgaonkar) and N.I.A. (Respondent No.2-NIA; Sandesh D. Patil with Chintan Shah). On 11 December 2024 the Special P.P. reported the N.I.A. had briefed the Additional Solicitor General of India, who was unwell, and sought accommodation; matter stood over to 8 January 2025 before Gadkari and Khata, JJ.
What did the court decide?
Adjournment of the appeal to 8th January 2025, granted at the request of the learned Special P.P. on account of the Additional Solicitor General of India being unwell. ¶¶13