Samadhan Balasaheb Patil v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural order on a criminal appeal: appeal copy not yet served on the legal-aid advocate for Respondent No.2; appellant directed to serve; matter listed for hearing. Earlier interim protection continued until the next date.
What did the court decide?
Continuation of previously granted interim protection till 9 October 2024.
What the court decided
NEETA SAWANT 22-CRI.APPEAL-770-2024.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 770 OF 2024
Samadhan Balasaheb Patil ….Appellant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….Respondents
Mr. Yash Fadtare i/by. Mr. Jaydeep D. Mane, for the Appellant.
Ms. Rashmi S. Tendulkar , APP for Respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Ritesh M. Thobde , Advocate appointed for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Date : 25 September 2024.
P.C. :
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Samadhan Balasaheb Patil
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Ors.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court