Writ petition against a cooperative bank, pending since 2017 and repeatedly listed with no petitioner present, was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13 wp 11431.2017.doc
1/1
Dusane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.11431 OF 2017
Shri. Masaji Kondiba Chavan .... Petitioner Vs.
Solapur Zilla Madhyavarti Sahakari .... Respondents Bank Maryadit & Anr.
None for the Petitioner. Mr. Suhas S. Inamdar for Respondent no.1.
Coram : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. Date : 11th October 2018.
P.C.:
1 None present for the petitioner. On the previous dates
also none appeared for the petitioner. On the preceding date also, the learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that he had received the copy of affidavit-in-reply and wanted to take instructions in respect of some of the issues raised in affidavit-inreply. The petition is of the year 2017 and has been listed 14 times.
The matter stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)
Masaji Kondiba Chavan
Solapur Zilla Madhyavarti Sahakari Bank Maryadit
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
