An appeal from order concerning a dispute with the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai was adjourned to a later date because the arguing counsel was held up in another court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES JOHNSON Date: 2024.04.01 19:31:39 GONSALVES +0530
53.ao74-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 74 OF 2024 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.766 OF 2024 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 74 OF 2024
Mohammed Aslam Khan
...Appellant/Applicant
vs.
The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai L- Ward And Another ...Respondents
Mr. Vijay Singh, i/b. Pratap Singh, for the Appellant.
Ms. Smita V. Tondwalkar, for Respondent/BMC.
CORAM : R.N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 1 APRIL 2024
P.C. :
. Since the arguing Counsel for the appellant is held up in another Court, as reported, stand over to 10 May 2024 .
(R.N. LADDHA, J.)
1 / 1
Mohammed Aslam Khan
The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai L- Ward
Another
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
