Sulochana Narahari Kandale v. Avadhut Mahadev Jamadagni
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeals referred to mediation by consent; an advocate was appointed mediator with parties sharing costs, and the appeals were listed for settlement.
What did the court decide?
Parties referred to mediation; appeals listed for settlement on a future date.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by VARSHA VARSHA VIJAY VIJAY RAJGURU RAJGURU Date: 2024.07.18 17:12:33 +0530
25-26-sa-88-2024-sa-89-2024.doc
varsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2024
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1392 OF 2024
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2024
Sulochana Narahari Kandale … Appellant/Applicant vs. Avadhut Mahadev Jamadagni … Respondent
WITH
SECOND APPEAL NO. 89 OF 2024 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1400 OF 2024
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sulochana Narahari Kandale
- appellant
Narahari Tukaram Kandale (deceased) through legal heirs
- respondent
Avadhut Mahadev Jamadagni
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court