Single-judge High Court of Bombay (Civil) dismissed appeal against order rejecting motion to restrain respondent from creating third-party interest in property; notice issued.
Appeal allowed with notice to respondent; returnable date fixed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by ANANT ANANT KRISHNA KRISHNA NAIK NAIK Date: 2024.12.03 10:48:44 +0530
7.AO.567.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 567 OF 2024
Sushila Shyam Shinde & Ors ...Appellants Versus Heeraman Baju Gunjal ...Respondent
****
Ms Purva Basrur a/w. Mr. Athish Shetty for the Appellants. None for the Respondent.
****
CORAM : M. M. SATHAYE, J.
DATED : 2nd DECEMBER 2024
P.C.:
(M. M. SATHAYE, J.)
1/1
akn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the rejection of the motion to restrain third-party interest in the property should be allowed.
Sushila Shyam Shinde & Ors
Heeraman Baju Gunjal
M. M. SATHAYE
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
