Bahusaheb Ramnath Kakade v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Consolidated 'paucity of time' adjournment order by Arun R. Pedneker, J., High Court at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench), dated 12.11.2024. Covers bail applications (BA 1842/2024; BA 2033, 2034, 2035, 2038/2024), anticipatory bail applications (ABA 572, 936, 1216, 1290, 1293, 1297, 1307, 1399, 1480, 1547, 1575, 1626 of 2024), applications for cancellation of bail (Nos. 19, 125, 126, 144, 146 and 194 of 2024, the last in BA/733/2024) and allied criminal applications (Criminal Application No. 4204 of 2024 in BA/1842/2024; No. 4171 of 2024 in ABA/1547/2024; No. 2832 of 2024 in BA/1798/2023). Matters stood over to 21/11/2024 and 22/11/2024; interim relief/undertakings/statements expressly continued till the next date. Administrative order only - no legal determination; cite, if at all, solely to show subsistence of interim relief over the adjournment period.
What did the court decide?
No fresh relief decided; the existing interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, in all listed matters is expressly ordered to continue till the respective next hearing date (21/11/2024 for the first group, 22/11/2024 for the second group, as per the schedule in the order).