A writ petition concerning measurement of property by a Court Commissioner became unnecessary after the Commissioner's report reached the Trial Court. The petition was disposed of as infructuous with liberty reserved to raise contentions in the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:24261
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
92 WRIT PETITION NO. 3779 OF 2024
CHANDRAPRAKASH NANDLAL BHANSALI
VERSUS
SANTOSH KUNDLIK DUGLE THROUGH GPA KALYAN KUNDLIK DUGLEAND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Patil Swapnil Shashikant
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : October 07, 2024
PER COURT :-
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
ssc/
Chandraprakash Nandlal Bhansali
Santosh Kundlik Dugle through GPA Kalyan Kundlik Dugle
Others
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
