Kishor Himatlal Mehta and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Three anticipatory bail applications concerning the same crime were adjourned at counsel's joint request to a specified later date, to be heard alongside two interim applications. The State undertook that the applicants would not be arrested in the interim.
What the court decided
Mamta Kale
16-aba-3125-2024.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3125 of 2024
Abhay Kishore Mehta ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
with
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2616 of 2024
Juana Sanjeev Uppal and Anr. ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents with Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2864 of 2024 Kishor Himatlal Mehta and Ors. ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr Akshay Kamble a/w Mr Umesh Waydande a/w. Ms Neha Patil a/w Mr Pritesh Bodekar a/w. Ms Trupti Poojary i/b. Vivaka Partners, for the applicants in ABA/2864/2024.
Mr Niranjan Mundargi i/b. Ms Grishma Lad a/w Ms Priyanka Yadav a/w. Ms Keral Mehta, for the applicant in ABA/3125/2024.
Mr Ashish Chavan a/w. Mr Ravi Vikey a/w. Mr Mayur Mohite, for the applicants in ABA/2616/2024.
Mr Anuj Jhaveri, Mr Vatsal Thakkar and Ms Ritisha Choudhary i/b. Mr Anuj Jhaveri, for the intervenor in all ABAs. Mr Amit A Palkar, APP for the respondent – State.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Abhay Kishore Mehta
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- applicant
Juana Sanjeev Uppal and Anr.
- applicant
Kishor Himatlal Mehta and Ors.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court