Vikram Mohan Tate v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application withdrawn by the applicant at counsel's instruction; leave granted and application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SMITA SMITA JOHNSONGONSALVES JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.10.14 18:12:42+0530
31.aba2780-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2780 of 2024
Vikram Mohan Tate ... Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr Laxman Shahapur, a/w. Mr Bhimanna Meti, Ms Monisa Usmani and Ms Shrusti Dubey, for the Applicant. Mr Amit A Palkar, APP, for Respondent State.
Coram : R.N. Laddha, J. Date : 14 October 2024
P.C. :
. The learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw this application. Leave granted as prayed for.
(R.N. Laddha, J.)
Page 1 of 1
14 October 2024
Vikram Mohan Tate
State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court