Mukesh Ghisulal Solanki v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application adjourned at counsel's request; notice to be issued to respondent No.2. Nothing substantive decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
17-aba-2392-2024.doc
Digitally signed byMAMTA AMARKALEDate: 2024.09.1114:09:32 +0530MAMTAAMARKALE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2392 of 2024
Mukesh Ghisulal Solanki
...Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. Kishor Parihariya i/b. Mr. Avdhesh Kanojiya, for the Applicant. Ms. Supriya Kak, APP for the Respondent – State. PSI Amruta Pandhare, Airport Police Station, is present.
Coram: R. N. Laddha, J. Date: 11 September 2024
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mukesh Ghisulal Solanki
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
R. N. Laddha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court