Partly allowed

Akbar Badroddin Munniwale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC14 Dec 2024ABA/1537/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application for applicant no.3. The interim protection order previously granted to applicants no.1 and 2 was confirmed subject to conditions regarding police attendance, non-tampering with evidence, and cooperation with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw application for applicant no.3; interim protection confirmed for applicants no.1 and 2 subject to conditions.

Akbar Badroddin Munniwale and Others Vs the State of… — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AUG:29747

¶2

1 915

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

915 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1537 OF 2024

¶5

Akbar S/o Badroddin Munniwale

¶6

Wasim S/o Akbar Munniwale

¶7

Imam S/o Ramju Munniwale @ Imam S/o Ramjan Munniwale .. Applicants

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

. The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents

¶10

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shinde Dhananjay M. APP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya

¶11

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 14^th DECEMBER, 2024

¶12

PER COURT:

¶13

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

¶14

2] The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.401 of 2024, registered at Hingoli City Police Station, District Hingoli, for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 326, 324, 323, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code & under Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act.

¶15

3] The learned counsel for the applicants seeks leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application to the extent of applicant no.3.

¶16

4] Leave granted.

¶17

2 915

¶18

5] Considering the role of the applicants no.1 and 2 and the corresponding injuries which is not ascertained, the interim protection granted by order dated 27.09.2024 stands confirmed to the extent of applicants no.1 and 2, on the following terms:

¶19

i] Applicants No.1 and 2 shall attend the police station as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶20

ii] Applicants No.1 and 2 shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. They shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

¶21

iii] Applicants No.1 and 2 shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

¶22

6] In the event, Applicants No.1 and 2 violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶23

7] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

¶24

8] The application stands disposed of.

¶25

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]

¶26

marathe

Akbar Badroddin Munniwale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akbar Badroddin Munniwale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Zubair Shaikh Subhan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Uddhav Madhavrao Rokade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Dilipsingh Harisingh Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rahimtullah Mamjibhai Meredia vs Rahim Kasamali Maredia

Nayara Energy Ltd. vs M/S Guru Seva Fuels

Mannan Bhurya Munniwale @ Manan Bhure Muniwale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another