Disposed

Mannan Bhurya Munniwale @ Manan Bhure Muniwale v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC14 Dec 2024ABA/1309/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought anticipatory bail in FIR No. 401/2024 for offences including attempt to murder and rioting. Medical certificates showed no serious injuries. Interim protection granted on 31.07.2024 was confirmed subject to conditions of fortnightly police attendance, non-tampering with evidence, and co-operation with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Interim protection confirmed with conditions including fortnightly police station attendance for four months.

Mannan Bhurya Munniwale @ Manan Bhure Muniwale Vs the State… — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1309.24ABA

¶2

2024:BHC-AUG:29610

¶3

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

914 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO.1309 OF 2024

¶6

MANNAN BHURYA MUNNIWALE @ MANAN BHURE MUNIWALE VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

¶8

Advocate for Applicant : Mr.D.M.Shinde APP for Respondent-State : Mr.P.K.Lakhotiya

¶9

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 14.12.2024

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

¶12

2] The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with FIR No. 401/2024, registered at Hingoli City Police Station, District Hingoli, for the offences punishable under sections 307, 326, 324, 323, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506 of IPC and u/sec.4 and 5 of the Arms Act.

¶13

3] This Court, by order dated 31.07.2024, granted interim protection in favour of the applicant. Perused medical certificate issued by the Government Hospital, so also, by the Private Hospital and there is no reflection of serious injuries in the medical certificate. In view of the

¶14

¶15

1309.24ABA

¶16

same, interim protection granted by order dated 31.07.2024 stands confirmed, on the following conditions :

¶17

i] The applicant shall attend the police station once a fortnight for a period for four months from today.

¶18

ii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

¶19

iii] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

¶20

4] In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶21

5] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

¶22

6] The application stands disposed of.

¶23

DDC

¶24

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE

Mannan Bhurya Munniwale @ Manan Bhure Muniwale v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mannan Bhurya Munniwale @ Manan Bhure Muniwale v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Zubair Shaikh Subhan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Uddhav Madhavrao Rokade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Dilipsingh Harisingh Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rahimtullah Mamjibhai Meredia vs Rahim Kasamali Maredia

Nayara Energy Ltd. vs M/S Guru Seva Fuels

Akbar Badroddin Munniwale and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another