Anticipatory bail application was mentioned by praecipe after the applicant had already been arrested; the court disposed of the application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P5_ABA_1259_24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1259 OF 2024
| Sangram @ Sangharsh Shankar Jagtap | … | Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| vs. | ||
| The State of Maharashtra | … | Respondent |
Mr. Hrishikesh S. Shinde for applicant.
Mr. Bapu V. Holambe-Patil, APP for respondent-State.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 27th JUNE, 2024
P.C. :
. Not on board. Mentioned by way of praecipe. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail application has been rendered infructuous, as the applicant has been arrested in the meanwhile.
(MANISH PITALE, J)
PRIYAKAMBLI Digitallysigned byPRIYAKAMBLIDate:2024.06.2810:28:31+0530 Priya Kambli
1/1
Sangram @ Sangharsh Shankar Jagtap
The State of Maharashtra
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
