Petitioner challenged an election process of a Respondent Society for the year 2020. The court noted the process was complete and nothing survived. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly without substantive discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1 39-WP-882.2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 882 OF 2020
Prabhu Govind Patil. … Petitioner. V/s.
State of Maharashtra and others. … Respondents.
SANJAY KASHINATH NANOSKAR
Digitally signed by SANJAY KASHINATH NANOSKAR Date: 2023.12.07 17:27:38 +0530
Nazia S.A.Shaikh i/b. Pradeep J. Thorat for the Petitioner. Mr.B.V.Samant, Addl.GP with Ms.R.A.Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent- State. Mr.Deelip Patil Bankar, Chief Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
Ms.Samruddhi Kulkarni i/b. Ajit Savagave for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR, AND MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 5 December 2023.
P.C. :
This petition is filed in respect of election process to the Respondent- Society of the year 2020. The election process was not deferred and is complete. Therefore, nothing survives in this petition. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Prabhu Govind Patil
State of Maharashtra
others
Nitin Jamdar
Manjusha Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
