The High Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the underlying application had been disposed of, rendering the interim order non-survivable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1 36-WP-778.2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 778 OF 2020
Dattatraya Rajaram Madane. … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others. … Respondents.
Mr.Laxman Shivajirao Deshmukh for the Petitioner. Mr.B.V.Samant, Addl.GP with Ms.R.A.Salunkhe, AGP for the State.
SANJAY KASHINATH NANOSKAR
Digitally signed by SANJAY KASHINATH NANOSKAR Date: 2023.12.07 17:27:40 +0530
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR, AND MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 5 December 2023.
P.C. :
The learned counsel for the Petitioner pointed out that the impugned order was an interim order pending disposal of the original application, and now the original application is disposed of. Therefore, nothing survives in this petition. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Dattatraya Rajaram Madane
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Manjusha Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
