Single paragraph order wherein the court disposed of a writ petition for issue of mandamus to redress grievances, deeming the matter infructuous after administration confirmed resolution of the complaints.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
909wp794o23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.794 OF 2023
ANIL YADAVRAO MAGAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Vishal A. Bagal Patil AGP for Respondents 1 to 3 and 6 and 7/State : Shri S.K. Tambe Advocate for Respondents 4, 5, 8 and 9 : Shri Bondar Uttam Bajirao
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE :- 27th January, 2023
Per Court :-
:-
2
909wp794o23.odt
25.01.2023, which is the order passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad and dated 11.02.2022, which
is the communication by the Deputy Commissioner (Establishment) to the Chief Executive Officer (five pages). The said compilation is taken on record and collectively marked as “X” for identification. It is informed that all deputations have been cancelled and the petitioner’s grievance has been redressed. 3. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is rendered infructuous and stands disposed off.
kps (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable in light of the administrative resolution addressing the petitioner's grievance.
Anil Yadavrao Magar
The State of Maharashtra
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
