This writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn based on instructions from the petitioner's counsel. The dispute lacks substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
910 wp 635.23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
910 WRIT PETITION NO.635 OF 2023
VRUSHALI SHASHIKANT JOSHI ALIAS VRUSHALI DINESH BHONG
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Markad Dattraya R.
AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. P.S. Patil
Advocate for Respondents : Ms. Suvarna Zavare
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE :25th January, 2023
P.C. :-
1. This matter was heard for some time.
2. The learned advocate for the petitioner had sought a pass over.
3. It is submitted on instructions that the petitioner desires to
withdraw this petition.
4. In view of the above, this petition is disposed off as withdrawn on
instructions.
[SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.][RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.]
mub
VRUSHALI SHASHIKANT JOSHI ALIAS VRUSHALI DINESH BHONG
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
RAVINDRA V GHUGE
SANJAY A DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court