The writ petition was disposed of without substantive adjudication as the petitioner was non-present and the matter was previously ordered dismissed for lack of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.WP.552.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.552 OF 2016
Monalisa Deshpande
Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra and othersRespondents
None for Petitioner.
Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP, for State.
CORAM :A.S.GADKARI AND
PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ.
DATE :5th April 2023
PC :
None for Petitioner. In view of Order dated 14th March 2023,
dismissed for non prosecution.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.S.GADKARI, J.)
MST
MANISH Digitally signedby MANISH SURESH SURESH THATTE Date: 2023.04.10 THATTE 09:48:02 +0530
Monalisa Deshpande
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court