Allowed
Umar Farooq Kadri Syed v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCIA/1043/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7.IA.1043.2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1043 OF 2023
IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2286 OF 2022
Umar Farooq Kadri SyedApplicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra and anotherRespondents
Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr.Ajay Patil, APP, for State.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI AND PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ.
DATE :5th April 2023
PC :
1.For the reasons stated in the Applications, the Application is
allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Learned Advocate for Applicant is directed to supply spare
copy in pursuance of Order dated 7th December 2022 within a period
of one week from today failing which present Application shall stand
dismissed without further reference this Court.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.S.GADKARI, J.)
MANISH Digitally signedby MANISH SURESH SURESH THATTE Date: 2023.04.10 THATTE 09:48:00 +0530
MST
Umar Farooq Kadri Syed
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court