The petitioner voluntarily withdrew the writ petition. The High Court granted leave to withdraw and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 1 16-wp40.18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 40 OF 2018
Samina Sajid Khan …..Petitioner
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra
…..Respondent
Adv. V.K. Dhawane i/by Adv. Vilas N. Mali & Associates for the Petitioner. Ms. G.P. Mulekar APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATE : 3rd APRIL, 2023.
P.C.:-
Learned Advocate for the Petitioner on instructions seeks leave
to withdraw present Petition unconditionally.
Leave granted.
Petition is disposed off, as withdrawn.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
SANJIV Digitally signed bySANJIV SHARNAPPA SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR MASHALKAR Date: 2023.04.1018:13:08 +0530
1/1
Samina Sajid Khan
The State Of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
