Petitioner withdrew the writ petition seeking stay on bail order of his son. Court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
958 CRWP 292 OF
2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
958 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.292 OF 2023
SUDAM VITTHALRAO MISAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Girish Wani h/f Mr. Randhave Milind Subhash
APP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. M. M. Nerlikar
CORAM: MANGESH S. PATIL &
M. M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE: 15.03.2023
PER COURT :
Learned advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to
withdraw the petition by stating that the petitioner’s son was arrested in
some crime. He was produced before the Magistrate and has been granted
bail.
2. Leave is granted.
3. The Criminal Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(M. M. SATHAYE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
mkd/-
1/1
SUDAM VITTHALRAO MISAL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
M. M. SATHAYE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court