Allowed

Dinesh Sambhajirao Londhe v. Vishwajit Ramesh Kasar and Others

Bombay HC14 Mar 2023APPLN/632/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed. The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad directed respondents to comply with the order of a previous judgment in CWP No. 1934/2019. The court permitted the petitioner to appear at the Kotwali Police Station, Ahmednagar on 10.04.2023 for inquiry and statement recording after recognizing unavoidable reasons for his delay. The petition and intervention application were disposed of simultaneous

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to comply with the earlier order of 12 February 2020 ensuring the petitioner appears before the Kotwali Police Station, Ahmednagar on 10.04.2023 for inquiry and statement

Dinesh Sambhajirao Londhe Vs Vishwajit… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶2

956 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.5 OF 2023 WITH APPLN/632/2023 IN WP/5/2023

¶3

VISHWAJIT RAMESH KASAR

¶4

VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶5

Advocate for the petitioner : Mr. R.R. Karpe APP for the respondent – State : Mr.G.O. Wattamwar Advocate for intervenor ; Mr.Z.H. Farooqui

¶6

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 14 MARCH 2023

¶7

PC :

¶8

We have heard learned advocate for the petitioner, learned APP and even learned advocate Mr. Z.H. Farooqui, who has filed application for intervention.

¶9

In criminal writ petition no. 1934/2019 by the order dated 12 February 2020 the petitioner herein was permitted to appear before Kotwali Police Station, Ahmednagar on 11 March 2020 and it was further directed to the Police to undertake an inquiry and if necessary to record his statement and take further action on the basis of that statement. Following was the order :-

¶10

“2. As the learned counsel for Petitioner submits that the Petitioner will go to Kotwali Police Station, Ahmednagar on 11^th March, 2020, the police are expected to make inquiry and if necessary record his statement and take further action on the basis of the

¶11

statement. Keep the present matter before this Court on 17^th March, 2020.”

¶12

The petitioner submits that due to unavoidable reasons, he

¶13

could not appear before the concerned Kotwali police station on the stipulated day, but later on he submitted a representation dated 28.11.2022 (Exhibit-E), expressing his readiness to appear before the authorities and to consider it.

¶14

Learned advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner would now appear before the concerned Kotwali Police Station, Ahmednagar on 10.04.2023.

¶15

We dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to comply with the order of this Court in criminal writ petition no.1934/2019 dated 12 February 2020 when the petitioner would appear before the Kotwali Police Station on 10.04.2023.

¶16

Criminal Application No.632 of 2023 seeking intervention is also disposed of.

¶17

[ M.M. SATHAYE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE

¶18

sga/

Dinesh Sambhajirao Londhe v. Vishwajit Ramesh Kasar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Sambhajirao Londhe v. Vishwajit Ramesh Kasar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harjit Singh S/O. Tirath Singh Sawhney Vs the State of Maharashtra

Suyadnya Vashist Maindad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Pramod Kamlakar Dalvi and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shravani Gangadhar Pagalwad through His Fater Natural Guardian Gangadhar Wamanrao Pagalwad Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Another

Lata W/O. Madhukar Cheke and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra

Manoj Shivajirao Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another