The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed an application where the applicant counsel withdrew the matter after the court expressed disinclination to grant relief on merits.
Criminal Application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 922-APPLN-318-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 318 OF 2023
Lata w/o Madhukar Cheke & Anr.
... Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Mr. Umesh Bodkhe Patil – Advocate for the applicants
Mr. S. J. Salgare – APP for respondent/State
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL
AND
M. M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATED : 14.03.2023
PER COURT : -
1.When we expressed our disinclination to grant any relief to
the applicants on merits, the advocate for the applicants, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the application.
2. Criminal Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
[ M. M. SATHAYE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ]
JUDGE JUDGE
SGP
Lata w/o Madhukar Cheke & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
MANGESH S. PATIL
M. M. SATHAYE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court