In Criminal Writ Petition No. 2673 of 2016, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner neither appeared nor was present on second call despite notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
904-wp-2673.16.doc
BIPIN Digitally signed byBIPIN DHARMENDER DHARMENDER PRITHIANI PRITHIANI Date: 2023.10.2016:50:36 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2673 OF 2016
Bhavin Nalinkant Shah … Petitioner Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Ms. S. D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 20 OCTOBER 2023
P.C. :-
. On 17 October 2023, none appeared for the petitioner and the matter was adjourned for today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Office noting shows that for want of a spare copy, notice could not be issued. Today also, even on second call, none present for the petitioner.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
Bhavin Nalinkant Shah
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
