Dismissed
Ratan Mohanlal Makhija v. Bhajanlal K. Makhija and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/870/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 6-wp-870.16.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
6-wp-870.16.doc
BIPINDHARMENDERPRITHIANI Digitally signed byBIPIN DHARMENDERPRITHIANIDate: 2023.10.1917:57:13 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 870 OF 2016
Ratan Mohanlal Makhija … Petitioner Versus … Bhajanlal K. Makhija & Anr. Respondents
Mr. Vijay Kiledar for the Petitioner. Mr. Rupesh Zade for the Respondent No.1. Ms. S. D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 19 OCTOBER 2023
P.C. :-
. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition as the petition becomes infructuous. Leave granted.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
Bipindharmenderprithiani
Bhajanlal K. Makhija & Anr.
R. N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court