Dismissed
Sikandar Hajratali Sayyad and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/2629/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 903-wp-2629.16.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
903-wp-2629.16.doc
BIPIN Digitally signed byBIPIN DHARMENDER DHARMENDER PRITHIANI PRITHIANI Date: 2023.10.2016:50:36 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2629 OF 2016
Sikandar Hajratali Sayyad & Anr.
… Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioners. Ms. S. D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 20 OCTOBER 2023
P.C. :-
. On 17 October 2023, none appeared for the petitioners and the matter was adjourned for today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Office noting shows that the notice issued to respondents No.3 and 4 is received back with remarks ‘not residing on the given address from last two years’. Today also, even on second call, none present for the petitioners.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
Sikandar Hajratali Sayyad
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court