The petitioner was permitted to withdraw the writ petition (2-WP-1290 of 2022) at the instance of the learned Counsel for Petitioners. The petition stands disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-WP-1290-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1290 OF 2022
RAVINDRA VASUDEV YADAV & ANR. )...PETITIONERS
V/s.
HARBAJANSINGH B. AJIMAL & ANR. )...RESPONDENTS
Ms.Amisha Lolusare i/b. Ms.Aditi Naikare, Advocate for the
Petitioners.
Mr.Ravindra Vasudev Yadav - Petitioner No.1 present in the Court.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:12th JUNE 2023
P.C.:
1. At the request of learned Counsel for Petitioners, who states
that she has instructions to withdraw the Writ Petition, the Writ
Petition stands disposed as withdrawn.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
avk 1/1
RAVINDRA VASUDEV YADAV
HARBAJANSINGH B. AJIMAL
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court