The single judge disposed the Civil Revision Application as withdrawn by the applicant during arguments. Interim applications were also disposed accordingly.
Civil Revision Application disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-CAC-228-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.126 OF 2011
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.228 OF 2018
IN
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.126 OF 2011
SHRI. KAMALAKAR VISHNU SAPRE )...APPLICANT
V/s.
SHRI. CHETAN PRABHAKAR PATWARDHAN)...RESPONDENT
Mr.Anand Lavate a/w. Ms.Aastha Desai and Ms.Gayatri Kapse,
Advocate for Applicant in C.A.No.228/2018 and Original
Respondent in C.R.A.No. 126/2011.
Mr.Mahesh Rawool i/b. Mr.A.B.Avhad, Advocate for the Applicant
in C.R.A.No. 126/2011.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:9th JUNE 2023
P.C.:
1. Mr.Rawool, learned Counsel for Revision Applicant, states on
instructions, that his client has instructed him to withdraw the
Civil Revision Application.
avk 1/2
8-CAC-228-2018.doc
2. The Civil Revision Applications stands disposed as withdrawn.
3.Civil Application / Interim Application, if any, also
accordingly stand disposed.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
avk 2/2
Shri. Kamalakar Vishnu Sapre
Shri. Chetan Prabhakar Patwardhan
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court