The High Court disposed of the criminal revision application by the applicant, who withdrew it to prosecute a separate petition regarding alteration of allowances before the Family Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MANDIRAMILINDSALGAONKAR Digitally signed byMANDIRA MILINDSALGAONKARDate: 2023.09.07 10:31:10+0530
1/2 2 REVN-98-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.98 OF 2016
Vijay Shriram Shejwal .. Applicant Versus Anita Vijay Shejwal & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Ashok B. Tajane for the Appellant. Mr.Rahul D. Motkari for the Respondent No.1. Mr.S.R.Agarkar, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent No.3.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 05th SEPTEMBER, 2023
P.C:-
The communication addressed to Advocate Tajane, is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identifcation.
M.M.Salgaonkar
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
M.M.Salgaonkar
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Shriram Shejwal
Anita Vijay Shejwal & Ors.
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
