The applicant was absent on the last date of hearing and did not appear on the current date. The interim application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 41 IA-567-20(5-9).odt
MANDIRAMILINDSALGAONKAR Digitally signed byMANDIRA MILINDSALGAONKARDate: 2023.09.0710:31:49 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.567 OF 2020
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.75 OF 2020
Milind K. Sable
.. Applicant
Versus
Vandana Ashok Shinde & Anr. .. Respondents
None for the Applicant.
None for the Respondent. Mr.S.R.Agarkar, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 06th SEPTEMBER, 2023
P.C:-
On the last date of hearing i.e. on 22/08/2023, none represented the Applicant.
Even today, the Applicant in Interim Application No.567 of 2020 is not represented. Hence, the Interim Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
M.M.Salgaonkar
Milind K. Sable
Vandana Ashok Shinde & Anr.
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
