A single judge of the Bombay High Court refused to grant an order for early hearing of a pending criminal appeal. The court reserved liberty to consider the request after six months and disposed of the interim application.
Request for early hearing dismissed; liberty to submit application again after six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 43 IA 1651-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1651 OF 2023
IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 888 OF 2021
Subraya Rama Hegde @ S.R. Hegde
Versus
State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Ms.S.V.Sonawane with Mr.Vipin R. Kasle for the applicant. Mr.S.R. Agarkar, APP for the State.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 5th SEPTEMBER, 2023
P.C:-
1 Perused the Interim Application.
The Interim Application is taken out for early hearing of the Criminal Appeal preferably by fixing it on a particular date.
2 The Appeal pertain to the year 2021 and in the wake of the pendency of the Appeals before this Court, I do not think that such a request can be granted at this stage.
Reserving the liberty to circulate the application after six months, the present Application is disposed off.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Tilak
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant an order for early hearing of the pending criminal appeal.
Subraya Rama Hegde @ S.R. Hegde
State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
