pil 88.21 as.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
A clerical correction directs the term 'Public Interest Litigation' replace 'Writ Petition' in order dated 9 March 2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/1 902 pil 88.21 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.88 OF 2021
The Barshi Bar Association ....Petitioner V/S The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents …
Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugle for the Petitioner. Mr. B.V. Samant , AGP for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 20 APRIL 2023.
P.C.:
The matter is placed for speaking to the minutes in respect of order dated 9 March 2023. The order is passed in PIL. However, in para 23, it is referred to as ‘Writ Petition is disposed of.’ Instead of the words ‘Writ Petition’ the same ought to be ‘Public Interest Litigation’. Necessary correction be carried out accordingly.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM RAJALINGAM KATKAM KATKAM Date: 2023.04.21 11:20:58 +0530
1/1
katkam
The Barshi Bar Association
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
