Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the filed public interest litigation. The court dismissed the petition allowing the withdrawal.
Leave to withdraw the PIL is allowed; PIL dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/1 3 pil 44.23 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.44 OF 2023
Anil Balaram Kene V/S
....Petitioner
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents
Mr. Jayendra D. Khairnar a/w Mr. Mufeej Ansari i/b Mr. Vikas B. Shivarkar for the Petitioner.
Ms. N.M. Mehra, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3-State.
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 10 MARCH 2023.
P.C.:
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner on instructions seeks leave to
withdraw the PIL. The PIL is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM
Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2023.03.14 10:47:20 +0530
1/1
Anil Balaram Kene
State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
