The High Court disposed of the Public Interest Litigation because the purpose of the petition ceased to exist after tender cancellations and completion of work at one site.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/1 22 pil 66.22 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2022
Dnyaneshwar Vitthal Mane V/S
....Petitioner
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents
Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. Jagdish G. Aradwad (Reddy) for successful bidder. Mr. P.P. Kakade, GP a/w Mr. M.M. Pabale, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 5 JANUARY 2023.
P.C.:
such is disposed of.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM RAJALINGAM KATKAM KATKAM Date: 2023.01.06 16:48:58 +0530
1/1
Dnyaneshwar Vitthal Mane
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Dnyaneshwar Vitthal Mane
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
