Coram permitted withdrawal of PIL 120/2021 with liberty to raise individual grievances in separate writs; P.L.I. disposed of as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the present PIL granted; disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
45-PIL.120.2021
jvs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SALUNKE
J V
Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.01.10 11:55:04 +0530
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 120 OF 2021
Sachin Gajanan Telange and Ors. } Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents
Mr. R. N. Kachave for the petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader with Ms. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for State.
Mr. Vishwanath Patil for respondents 6 and 7 (MSRDC).
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE: JANUARY 9, 2023
P.C.:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present public interest litigation with liberty to file individual writ petitions asserting their respective rights.
2. In view of the request made, the present public interest litigation is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
3. The petitioners may file individual writ petitions raising their individual grievances.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Sachin Gajanan Telange and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
