ought to have been considered on priority. The authorities have favoured respondent no. 4. The petitioner was initially posted at Sajja Khaniwade. In the interregnum, the petitioner was suspended. The suspension of the petitioner was revoked. The petitioner was posted thereafter at Sajja Sopara. The petitioner challenged the same before the Tribunal by filing an original application. Though the Tribunal did not pass orders with regard to transfer on the ground that vacancy was not available at Khaniwade, the Tribunal directed authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for transfer as and when vacancy arises. According to the learned advocate for the petitioner, in the year 2018, a request was made by the petitioner for transfer as the post at Khaniwade was vacant. The petitioner requested for transfer at the vacant posts at Pelhar, Waliv, Khaniwade or Shirsad. However, none of the said places were considered and respondent no. 4 was transferred at Pelhar. Though the Tribunal set aside the transfer order of the petitioner, the Tribunal did not pass a further order for transferring the petitioner at the preferred place. The learned advocate submits that the same is discriminative. The Government Resolution dated 9th April 2018 is not adhered to.
