Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw PIL approaching NGT instead of depositing mandatory levy. Court disposed of petition as withdrawn upon application.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach NGT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) 911 pil 44.23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
911 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.44 OF 2023
CHHAWA SWARAJYA SAMAJIK SANSTHA
THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT WORK PRESIDENT AARIF SUBHAN SHAIKH
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Chaudhari Shrikrushna U.
AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya
Advocate for R/1 to 3 : Mr. B.M. Dhanore
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE :12th July, 2023
P.C. :-
1.When we called upon the Petitioner to deposit an amount of
Rupees Five Lakhs in view of Section 7 A(i) of the Bombay High Court PIL
Rules 2010, the learned advocate for the Petitioner submits on instructions that
the Petitioner would approach the National Green Tribunal and seeks liberty to
withdraw this petition.
2.In view of the above, this petition is disposed off as withdrawn.
[Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.]
[RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.]
mub
Chhawa Swarajya Samajik Sanstha
The Union of India
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Y.G. Khobr agade
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court