This PIL alleged encroachment on Gairan lands by Respondent No. 7. The Court found individual PILs unnecessary as general directions for removal were already issued. It granted liberty to report facts to the Collector for action under such directions.
Liberty to bring facts to the Collector, Kolhapur for action per general directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
37-PIL.123.2022
jvs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 123 OF 2022
Mr. D. V. Sutar with Mr. Kiran G. Kulkarni for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader with Ms. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for respondents 1 to 4 (State).
Mr. Ganesh Sovani with Ms. Rupali Shinde for respondent no. 6.
CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR, ACTING CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE: 5 JULY 2023
P.C. :
. The present PIL is filed making a grievance that Respondent No. 7 has encroached upon Gairan lands.
1
37-PIL.123.2022
JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE
Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Date: 2023.07.10 17:38:53 +0530
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation No. 2 of 2022Affirmed¶12
Petitioner
NITIN JAMDAR
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
