The petitioner withdrew the writ petition on instructions and sought liberty to approach the Civil Court, after which the court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
The petition was disposed off as withdrawn on instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
919 WRIT PETITION NO.8137 OF 2023
PRASHANT PURUSHOTTAM DIXIT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Mr.H.P.Randhir, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.S.G.Karlekar, AGP for the Respondent / State.
( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.)
DATE : JULY 11, 2023
PER COURT:
1. This matter was heard for some time.
2. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits on
instructions that he would avail of a remedy as may be permissible in
Law by approaching the Civil Court. This Petition be disposed off.
3.By keeping the above liberty open, this petition is disposed
off, as withdrawn on instructions.
( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
khs/July 2023/8137
PRASHANT PURUSHOTTAM DIXIT
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
RAVINDRA V. GHUDGE
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court