Petitioner sought leave to withdraw writ petition (WP. 804 of 2017). The court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
Leave granted to withdraw writ petition; dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
501-WP.804.2017
jvs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SALUNKE
J V
Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.01.10 11:55:05 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 804 OF 2017
Uttam Khobragade } Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Arsh Mishra i/b. Mr. Saikumar Ramamurthy for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Shastri, AGP for respondent no. 1 (State).
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE: JANUARY 9, 2023
P.C.:
1. The learned advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The writ petition as such is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Uttam Khobragade
State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
