in sast-29454-2019.doc Pallavi IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
34-ia-2319-2020 in sast-29454-2019.doc
Pallavi
Digitally signed by PALLAVI MAHENDRA PALLAVI WARGAONKAR MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date: 2023.01.27 15:32:21 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2319 OF 2020 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.29454 OF 2019
Shri. Badasaha Mirasshab @ Abalal Fakir
(deceased Thr. LRs)
Khairun Badashaha Fakir and Ors. ...Applicants
In the matter between
Shri Badasaha Mirasshab @ Abalal Fakir
(deceased Through His Legal Heirs) & Ors.…Appellants
Versus
Sonabai Ramu Ambi (deleted as per order
on Exh.19 Dt. 28.11.2023)
Shri Babasaheb Issak...Respondent
Mr. V.B. Rajure, for the Appellants/Applicants.
Mr. Om Latpate i/b. Kuldeep U. Nikam, for the Respondents.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 25th JANUARY 2023
P.C.:
1. There is one day’s delay in filing Interim Application.
2. The learned Advocate of the Respondents takes objection for condonation of delay.
3.However, for the reasons set out in the Interim Application, the
same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Interim Application is
disposed of in above terms.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
1/1
Khairun Badashaha Fakir
Sonabai Ramu Ambi
MADHAV J. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court