The High Court allowed a civil application seeking to record the heirs of a deceased appellant, condoning the delay in filing. The applicant argued that heirs were already on record.
Civil application allowed; heirs to be recorded; amendment to be carried out within three weeks; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
37-cas-12-2018.doc
Pallavi
PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR
Digitally signed by PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date: 2023.01.24 19:01:40 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12 OF 2018
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.246 OF 1998
Shri Gangaram Raosaheb Dhumal and Ors. ...Appellant/Applicant
Versus
Shri Baban Sahebrao Lawand and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Rahul S. Kate, for the Appellant/Applicant.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 24th JANUARY 2023
P.C.:
1. This Civil Application is taken out to bring on record the heirs of deceased Appellant No.4C.
2. Mr. Kate states that the legal heirs of Appellant No.4C are
already on record as Appellant No.4A. Therefore, although there is delay in filing the application, in the facts and circumstances of this case, delay deserves to be condoned.3. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b), (c)
and (d). Amendment be carried out within a period of three weeks
from today. Civil Application is disposed of in above terms with no
order as to costs.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
1/1
Shri Gangaram Raosaheb Dhumal and Ors.
Shri Baban Sahebrao Lawand and Ors.
Madhav J Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court