in sa-874-2018.doc Pallavi IN THE HIGH COURT…
Application allowed to condone delay of 164 days in filing the second appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29-cas-725-2018 in sa-874-2018.doc
Pallavi
Digitally signed PALLAVIMAHENDRAWARGAONKAR by PALLAVIMAHENDRAWARGAONKARDate:2023.01.25 19:45:03 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.725 OF 2018 IN
SECOND APPEAL (ST.) NO.874 OF 2018
Sudesh Sharad Redij and Ors. ...Appellants/Applicants
Versus
Sunil Shankar Redij and Ors. ...Respondents
Ms. Gracy Saldanha i/b. R.D. Suryawanshi for the Appellants/Applicants.
Mr. Rahul V. Mane i/b. S.A. Rajeshirke for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 25th JANUARY 2023
P.C.:
1. Heard Ms. Gracy Saldanha, learned counsel appearing for the
Applicants and Mr. Rahul Mane, learned counsel appearing for the
Respondent No.1 who is the contesting Respondent.
2.There is delay of 164 days in filing the Second Appeal. The
learned counsel appearing for the Respondents strongly opposes the
application.
3.However, sufficient reasons are given in the Civil Application.
For the reasons set out in the Civil Application, the same is allowed in
terms of prayer clause (b).
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal application deserves condonation of delay.
Sudesh Sharad Redij
Sunil Shankar Redij
Madhav J Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court