Single judge order restoring a Writ Petition dismissed for default after counsel submitted the petition remained valid and lacked a filed praecipe proving infructuousness.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neeta Sawant 1/1 sr.26
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 20258 OF 2022
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 8458 OF 2004
Mahesh Pamaji Somshetty ...Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Milind R. Deshpande, for the Applicant.
Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Dated : 21 September 2023.
P.C. :
Digitally signed by NEETA NEETA SHAILESH SHAILESH SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2023.09.26 10:47:54 +0530
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
