The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed an interim application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The court condoned the delay and disposed of the interim application.
Delay in filing appeal is condoned; interim application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19-IA-2499-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2499 OF 2023 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER(ST) NO. 1935 OF 2023
M/s. Kalyan Roperties, a Partnership Firm
Through Its Partners Chetan Prabhashankar Joshi & Anr. ...Applicant/ Appellant
Versus
Union of India
Through The Divisional Engineer (LM) and Others ...Respondents
Mr. G.S. Godbole, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay, for Applicant/ Appellant.
Mr. R.P. Ojha a/w Mr. Rakesh Dubey for Respondent No.1. Mr. A.S. Rao, for Respondent Nos.13.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 20, 2023.
P.C.:
Appeal. The application is opposed by the learned counsel appearing for
Respondent-Union of India.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR JAMADAR Date:2023.09.25 11:03:46 +0530
1/1
Sajakali Jamadar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal is condonable under the rules of court.
M/s. Kalyan Properties, a Partnership Firm Through Its Partners Chetan Prabhashankar Joshi & Anr
Union of India Through The Divisional Engineer (LM) and Others
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
