In an interim application, the Single Judge allowed the applicant to withdraw the application after the underlying arbitral award was set aside by this Court under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Application dismissed as withdrawn; leave to withdraw granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6.ia.1686.2023.doc
Chaitali Ekke
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1686 OF 2023 IN
APPEAL NO. 257 OF 2017
Vardhaman Builders Applicant (Org. Respondent / …Claimant)
In the matter between Narendra Balasaheb Ghatge and Anr. Appellants(Org. …Respondents)
Versus Vardhaman Builders Respondent (Org. Petitioner / …Claimant)
Mr. Kevic Setalvad, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Jehan Lalkaka, Ms. Poorva Garg & Mr. Simon Mascarenhas i/b Mulla & Mulla and Craigie Blunt & Caroe, Advocate for Applicant / Respondent in Appeal. Mr. Sunil Mogre a/w Mr. Yadunath Chaudhari a/w Mr. Chinmaya Acharya i/b Mr. Kevin Pereira, Advocate for Appellant.
P.C.:
1 After the Application was heard for some time,
Mr. Setalvad, on instructions, states that since the award has been set
aside in the order passed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as, “The Arbitration Act,’ for short), Applicant would move the learned Single Judge in an Application under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, and sought leave to withdraw this Application.
1/2
6.ia.1686.2023.doc
accordance with law, and the appropriate forum will decide it on the merits of that Application.
merits of the matter.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2/2
Vardhaman Builders
Narendra Balasaheb Ghatge
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
