In interim application condoning a two-day delay, the High Court of Bombay accepted the application and disposed of it, directing the main appeal to be listed in due course. No substantive issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.ia.1460.2023.doc
Chaitali Ekke
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1460 OF 2023 IN
APPEAL (L) NO. 7756 OF 2023
BNC Power Project Limited Applicant / …Appellant Versus Sunil Kotecha and Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Anuj Desai a/w Ms. Sonal Sanap i/b Apex Law Partners, Advocate for Applicant/Appellant.
Mr. Rohaan Cama i/b Mr. Kunal Chheda, Advocate for Respondents. Mr. Aditya Pimple for Official Liquidator.
P.C.:
1 Since the delay is only of two days, Mr. Cama states that
keeping open Respondents’ rights and contentions, the court may
condone the delay. Delay condoned.
3 Appeal to come up in due course.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
1/1
BNC Power Project Limited
Sunil Kotecha
RAJESH S. PATIL
K. R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
