The interim application was considered by the appellate bench without the applicant or his advocate present. The five-day delay was condoned, and the application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.ia.1127.2023.doc
Chaitali Ekke
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1127 OF 2023
IN
APPEAL (L) NO. 2052 OF 2023
Simarpal Singh Sawhney
Applicant …(Org. Applicant)
Versus Madhu Bhatti and Ors. Respondents (Org. …Defendants)
None for Applicant / Appellant.
CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 24th April 2023
P.C.:
1 Considered the Interim Application without the Assistance
of the Applicant or his Advocate.
2 Since the delay is stated to be only five days, and in view of
what is stated in paragraph 3 of the Application, delay of five days is condoned.
3 Application disposed.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
1/1
Simarpal Singh Sawhney
Madhu Bhatti and Ors.
K. R. Shriram
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
