Interim application by applicants seeking dispensation of service on Respondent No.1 was dismissed by the Bombay High Court, holding such dispensation could not be granted.
Application for dispensation of service dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.ia.1172.2023.doc
Chaitali Ekke
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1172 OF 2023 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 659 OF 2019
Dr. Devchand Hemraj Gala and Ors. …Applicants Versus
Salinderkaur Harminder Ratol and Ors. …Respondents
Ms. A. Khan i/b Mr. A.M. Gokhale, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. Devendranath S. Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 6th April 2023
P.C.:
1 This Application is for dispensation of service on
Respondent No.1. We cannot grant such dispensation. Application dismissed.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether dispensation of service upon the respondent should be granted in the interim application for service of summons.
Dr. Devchand Hemraj Gala and Ors.
Salinderkaur Harminder Ratol and Ors.
K. R. Shriram
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
